Category Archives: Organic SEO

Early this morning, we observed an interesting development in one of our clients’ Google listings.

Google Maps shows two different listings for the same business. In some cases they are almost completely different records, but in other cases the listings are nearly identical. The most common differences are found in the business’s address or phone number.

We’ve grouped these phenomena into two categories: alias duplicates and exact duplicates.

In the case of the alias duplicates, the authentic listing shows up exactly as it is supposed to—the contact information and content we provided appear as expected. However, another business listing can be found that contains identical contact information and content; the only noticeable difference is the business name.

To determine if the listing is an alias duplicate, copy the permalink to the listing (which can be found in the link box). Travel to this link instead of the link you’re already viewing. There will be a question mark (?) in front of the CID and then a number. This number is the unique content identifier used by Google. If they are the exact same number, you’ll be looking at the exact same record, but with two different faces. The results shown depend upon the user’s query. To establish which record is the primary record, remove every part of the URL after the CID number. Traveling to this link will bring you to the primary record, which is the most trustworthy listing. The other record is maintained by Google just in case someone is to directly search for that business by its content alone.

For example, if ABC Plumbing was the primary record and Powerhouse Plumbing was the alias duplicate, Powerhouse Plumbing would only be viewed if someone directly queried Powerhouse Plumbing, since all of the content in the record would yield results for ABC Plumbing. It’s for this reason that a primary record and its duplicate listing will never be seen in the same search results.

Unfortunately, there’s very little we can do about this anomaly, but comfort can be taken in the fact that the alias duplicate can only be found when a user searches for that business name directly—there’s no other way to find the duplicate listing. On top of this, any attempt to utilize the contact information will result in contact with the business in the primary record.

Exact duplicates are listings that closely match the business name and contact information, but have entirely different content. They also have different records, or CIDs. At first glance, it looks as though Google has failed to compress these accounts into a single listing. This could be due to the fact that the two records do not have overlapping categories, or much of any other comparable information for that matter.

In order to let Google know about these issues, take the following steps:

When you notice these records on an A-J Google Maps search, go to the bottom of the page. Click the link that reads “Report a problem,” note that the search results contain multiple listings for the same place, and then note that the two records are exact duplicates.

Earlier this month we began observing a major shift in the Google Everything local search results (i.e. Hybrid local results). The hybrid local results started appearing last November for most local search queries. During that time, we observed that Google had a brand filter in place, which caused businesses with multiple locations to be limited to a single listing on Google.

However, earlier this week, the pendulum swung back in favor of local businesses. We arrived at this conclusion by observing the following occurrences:

1) Multiple results from the same businesses entity.

2) Rankings are no longer in direct correlation to organic webpage placement.

So what are the new results?  A quick sampling and survey suggests that the hybrid results are the same results as contained in the first page of Google Maps.  However, the actual ranking of the first page of results is different.  The strong bias that the organic-like ranking algorithm had is no longer taking precedence and the traditional Maps search results are shining through once again. This essentially opens the door back up for local businesses and helps them achieve prime organic search results.

At the same time, we are seeing many more 7-pack results and less hybrid results. The differences are illustrated here.

For lack of a better nomenclature, we’ll dub this the Google Local Panda update (or LP) since it follows the recent Google Panda search algorithm update, however it is likely not associated with that update in any way.

Has anyone else observed this update?

Google’s search engine results page (SERP) has undergone dramatic change over the last few months. The most significant change (especially for those interested in local search engine optimization) is the integration of Place results with organic results on the SERP (i.e., Hybrid Results).

Local Splash has been closely evaluating how the Hybrid Results affect ranking, impressions and click through rate. To determine if any changes to optimization strategy should be implemented, we must understand what factors dictate whether Google displays the 7-Pack or the new Hybrid Results on the SERP.

7-Pack vs Hybrid Results

An in-depth study of various queries across 20 cities was conducted by Local Splash. The primary factor used by Google to determine which format local results are displayed is the Web Content directly associated with the local results: 7-Pack or Hybrid. Web content is a brief snippet between the title of the Place and the URL. In nearly all cases, Hybrid Results are displayed if the top three Place listings contain a Web Content snippet.

7 Pack in Search Engine Result Page

Hybrid Results in Search Engine Result Page

Snippet vs No Snippet

This snippet is only displayed when the page is natural HTML, does not redirect to another pager, and is considered unique content by Google. The web page associated with the local result can be managed by the verified owner of a Place Page. For Place Pages that are not owner verified, Google will make efforts to include a Web page and snippet that is directly associated with the Place listing (e.g., the location page of the businesses web site).

Google Place Listing Snippets

We continue to investigate how Web Content affects local business ranking, and will publish our findings in an upcoming post.

UPDATE January, 2011:

After careful sampling in comparing implicit and explicit local search querier, we’ve found that the hybrid algorithm closely resembled that of traditional web organic results in a few ways:

  • Businesses with multiple locations in a single city are limited to a single search result.
  • As with web search, the results are webpages and a map letter is assigned if a Place page can be associated to it.  The association occurs when a Place’s website is matched to the root domain of the webpage URL.
  • The ranking of the hybrid webpages was found to nearly match that of a traditional Google web search.  Since Google serves local results for nearly all local queries, we had to compare this by running queries from computers outside the United States and on queries that wouldn’t commingle Places page results.

The implications of this mean that larger, well established websites with local properties have a disproportionate advantage in local search.  In fact, we’ve observed some cases where very poorly ranking Maps results shot up to the top page of a hybrid result simple because their website was well optimized.

It’s a sad day for local business owners that haven’t invested in a decent website.